Why HR Should Toss the Annual Compensation Review

Posted on by Leave a Comment

Wikimedia Commons, Public Domain

Most of us are familiar with the annual performance review process (whether we like it or not!). In addition to annual performance reviews, some companies also implement an annual compensation review process. Sometimes the compensation review is linked to the performance review process, and sometimes it’s not. But regardless of how it’s positioned, the annual compensation review is one potentially destructive practice.

What Drives Annual Compensation Reviews?

When a company chooses to review compensation on an annual basis, the decision is generally driven by a Finance process rather than an HR process. In other words, the review is motivated by budget management concerns rather than retention and succession planning objectives. Understandably, this results in conversations about “how little can we get away with paying this person,” which (especially with top performers) typically leads to a negotiation—and often a confrontational one.

What’s worse, standard compensation review processes seldom (if ever) involve employee feedback or any other information outside the projected salary budget Finance is aiming for. Typically the manager pushes out the proscribed increases to staff based on this limited information, practically ensuring a high error rate, broken trust and employee dissatisfaction. One wonders why any organization would choose to use a process designed to produce bad salary decisions?

Annual Feedback Doesn’t Work

When compensation review is an annual process, it also means that managers can only make corrections or changes at this one time in the year. Knowing this, managers invariably “over steer” since they’ll be locked in for a year once a decision is made. This tendency is further complicated by the manager’s awareness that any change in compensation will be seen as feedback. Employees perceive (rightfully or not) that increased compensation means a job well done, and that static compensation implies sub-par performance. There is growing awareness of how ineffective annual feedback is as compared to ongoing feedback in managing performance and fostering employee engagement. Since changes in compensation are a feedback mechanism, why limit them to once per year?

More Reviews Provide Better Data

Finally, for the Finance department, even from a budgeting and data monitoring perspective, limiting the organization to annual, discrete changes in compensation reduces the richness of data that payroll, finance, CRM, and practically every other system collects. If, instead, a more organic approach was taken to compensation increases, the same macro information would be available (i.e. how much more do we spend each year?) while allowing for deeper analysis of compensation trends based on other parameters (e.g. seasonality, time since hire, correlation to performance, etc.). As an added bonus, cost savings could be realized from the elimination of process overhead.

Aside from creating obstacles for managers, annual compensation reviews also create challenges for employees. If an employee knows he’ll be taking on greater responsibility and additional tasks in six months due to a planned project or anticipated hires on his team, he will face a difficult choice: does he fight now to be paid more than the position is worth, knowing in six months his compensation will be better aligned, or does he accept appropriate pay now and live with being underpaid for the last six months of the year. Employees who understand the implications will typically fight for the earlier raise, which means the organization is both incentivizing employees to ask for premature raises, while at the same time setting employees up for frustration when a deserved raise lags a promotion or greater responsibility.

A Better Approach to Raises

To alleviate this problem, organizations can separate the idea of organizational cost-of-living or pay band adjustments from merit increases. Annual Cost of Living Adjustment (COLA) raises, calculated based on inflation, can be applied automatically on a convenient annual cycle. Similarly, adjustments to pay bands, which are designed to keep up with external market factors and are calculated based on external information, can be applied automatically without requiring review. By removing these elements from performance-based compensation discussions, the organization removes a critical time constraint from the equation and allows managers to offer merit increases when they are most relevant. Feedback is best delivered “in the moment”, and merit increases should follow this rule. Allowing managers to provide increases when deserved (e.g. when taking on more responsibility, or achieving significant growth milestones) gives them the flexibility to provide effective and timely feedback. This, in turn, will result in more trusting and satisfied teams.

 

Create real efficiencies and support great performance with continuous feedback. Try TribeHR today.

Working Offsite Boosts Creativity and Focus

Posted on by Leave a Comment

Geographic Project, Barrie Eyre, Wikmedia Commons We recommend that vacation time be a time to unplug, unwind and recharge. Taking work on a vacation does not help with any of those objectives. On the other hand, turning remote work into something enjoyable in a vacation-like environment never hurt anyone. This is not to suggest that “workations” replace regular vacations. On the contrary, this is about doing the work you might normally do in your home office or at a co-working location on a beach, at a cottage, on your patio or even on a mountaintop. Sometimes a change …

Training: It Takes all Types

Posted on by Leave a Comment

In previous blog articles we’ve talked about communications styles and learning styles, but did you know that people who deliver training fall into four distinct styles as well? If you’ve ever participated in work-related training, you know that not all trainers are created equal. Some have the ability to connect with participants and lead them through the most complex material with ease, while others lose everyone at hello. Dolphin Academy, Wikimedia Commons Multiple Training Modes for Best Outcomes As a trainer, it’s important to know your strengths and weaknesses and to understand your own …

Spring Forward at Work

Posted on by Leave a Comment

Anyone who has lived through this past winter (yes, it’s over, even if Mother Nature hasn’t quite conceded the point yet!), knows that weather can affect your mood.  From the physiological and psychological reactions to reduced daylight and perpetual cold, to acute stress caused by hazardous driving conditions and having to winter-dress children every time they leave the house; life in general is just a bit harder when facing a harsh winter. Grasshopper of the ZEBRA Stelzentheater, by Katharina on Flikr On the flip side, sunny days and balmy temperatures have been shown to increase …

Why Employees See Things Differently

Posted on by Leave a Comment

In speaking with business leaders and executives, one of the most commonly expressed concerns is the difficulty they experience in getting employees to think strategically and to consider the broader business implications of their decisions and actions. Consider, for example, time. Salvador Dali, Portrait of Time, Photograph by Julo, Wikimedia Commons, Public Domain Time is Money Effective business executives know that time is (literally) money. That’s why they hire employees and then delegate anything that doesn’t require their presence as a leader, their expertise or their authority. They think carefully before allocating time to an activity …

Compensation Equity

Posted on by Leave a Comment

Arriving at fair compensation is not always easy. Aside from the fact that each position has a unique value to an organization and not all jobs are created equal, employers also face the challenge of recognizing and rewarding exemplary performance in a given role. Add to that the fact that people seldom agree on what’s fair and compensation design becomes that much more complicated. Freedom or Fairness by Nina Paley, Wikimedia Commons, Creative Commons Employees consider two things when assessing whether their own compensation is fair. How their compensation compares to their co-workers. How their compensation compares to …

Compensation Design: Beyond Foundational Needs

Posted on by Leave a Comment

US Treasury, Wikimedia Commons, Public Domain We spend a lot of time thinking about (and writing about) employee motivation,engagement and what it takes to create an awesome work environment with a high performance culture. But, before we can turn our sights to creating that awesome environment, there are some basics that must be addressed. As Maslow discovered, people are motivated by different things depending on their current state. This means that people’s foundational (physiological) needs must be met before more complex needs even hit their radar. In the context of the workplace, foundational needs typically relate to …

5 Ways to Hack Your Job Search

Posted on by Leave a Comment

It’s a competitive environment for job seekers these days— in spite of the fact that so many employers are bemoaning the skills gap and struggling to find the right people. At TribeHR we see a lot of resumes. Since we’re in growth mode, we expect to see a lot more. Hack Factory by Paul Sobczak, Flikr We do everything we can to make it easy for candidates to apply and for managers to hire. Using our own social HCM software we accept applications directly from social media sites and track them through the entire hiring …

HCM Research Sampler

Posted on by Leave a Comment

A lot of interesting HCM research has been published over the past few months. Whenever we come across new research, we tweet about it. If it resonates with us, we reference it in a blog or even dedicate a full article to it if we find the research especially relevant. A couple of things struck me the other day: Research Process by jtneill, Wikimedia Commons, Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Twitter feeds fly by and few people regularly review historical tweets. HR practitioners and decision makers are often too busy to find and read the available research. So, for those of you …

Making the Most of the Open Talent Economy

Posted on by Leave a Comment

Both supply and demand are shifting in the global competition for talent. Much of this change is driven by significant shifts in the way business is conducted around the world, with exports and imports accounting for an ever-larger slice of global GDP and the elimination of geography as the primary determinant of access to labor markets.  But even as barriers dissolve, needs become more complex and harder to meet, creating the paradox of the global skills gap. According to recent estimates by the International Labor Organization, 40 million workers in the industrialized world are unemployed, and yet employers struggle to …

Next Page

Experience TribeHR for Yourself
Contact us to schedule a demo of TribeHR.

Book A Demo
The Latest from Workplace Tribes
Why HR Should Toss the Annual Compensation Review April 16, 2014
Working Offsite Boosts Creativity and Focus April 11, 2014
Training: It Takes all Types April 09, 2014
Spring Forward at Work April 07, 2014
Why Employees See Things Differently April 04, 2014
 
Compensation Equity April 02, 2014
Compensation Design: Beyond Foundational Needs March 31, 2014
5 Ways to Hack Your Job Search March 28, 2014
HCM Research Sampler March 26, 2014
Making the Most of the Open Talent Economy March 24, 2014