Intent Versus Impact

Posted on by Leave a Comment

Have you ever written an email, left a message or made a comment that was completely misinterpreted by the person who received it?

woman raising her hands in surprise at the content of a presentation

Welcome to the world of (mis)communication. We all have different ways of expressing ourselves and, in most cases, prefer that style of communication and expect (consciously or subconsciously), other people to conform to it. But, of course, other people have their own communication styles and preferences as well, and expect similar accommodation.

On top of that, we all apply our own personal filters to each incoming message and interpret it accordingly!

The truth is, when it comes to communication, we are all so busy listening to what we want to hear and reading what we expect to read that we often miss the meaning of the message entirely. In other words:

 “The single biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place.”

                                                                        ~ George Bernard Shaw

That’s why it’s so important to close your “intent versus impact” communication gap and make sure your message is received as intended!

How to Close the Gap

There are three things you can do to reduce the gap between what you mean to communicate and the message received on the other end.

1. Communication Empathy

The first is to cultivate a heightened awareness of people’s reactions, including: body language, facial expressions, tone of voice, the atmosphere in the room, or the sudden, heavy silence on the other end of the telephone line. Pay attention to any indications that the impact of what you’re saying is different than what you expected and try a different approach.

Of course, this presupposes that the communication is taking place either face-to-face, by video or on the phone. It’s much harder to read the impact of your message in an email or text response, even when it’s punctuated with emoticons. Perhaps, if you know the person you are communicating with well, you might be able to read between the written lines. But more often than not, even our best attempts to intuit the meaning behind the meaning are skewed by our own communication preferences and personal filters.  

As human beings, we are actually pretty good mind-readers when we have the luxury of face-to-face communication. Once we lose the additional information that visual and auditory input provides, our ability to assess whether our message was received as intended is significantly impaired.

2. Communication Alignment

The second way to improve the odds that your message is getting through as intended is to become adept at communicating in the preferred medium and style of the person your message is meant for. In the workplace, that means paying attention to the way co-workers and the people on your team communicate and striving to match that mode of communication when interacting with them. To achieve your desired result, for example, you might send a succinct email to one person and schedule a 30 minute conversation with another to share the same information—based on their preferred mode of communication.

More often than not, when communication goes off track it’s not what is said (or written), but how it’s said (or written). With practice, you can become the kind of communicator who seems to know exactly the right words at the right time for everyone you interact with.

3. Communication Clarity

The third thing you can do to close the “intent versus impact” communication gap is to take the time to clarify what message was received. This is not to suggest that you pepper your communication with questions like: “Do you understand?” or “Do you get my meaning?” These closed questions will most often be answered in the affirmative. After all, we seldom know when we’ve misunderstood or misinterpreted a message. Typically, miscommunication only becomes apparent once it’s shared or acted upon, when it’s often too late for corrective measures.

Here are a few examples of the type of clarification that helps close the gap between intent and impact.

  • After a discussion, during which a number of items were agreed upon, ask your team member to summarize the conversation in an email, to make sure you’re both on the same page and can hold each other accountable.
  • When composing important written messages, have them reviewed by one or two people who tend to think and communicate differently from you. Ask them to paraphrase the meaning and intent they take from the content.
  • When planning an important presentation, do a dry run with a diverse group of co-workers or friends. Ask them to describe the meaning and intent that comes through.
  • During sensitive conversations, stop from time to time to re-state what you’ve heard and understood and ask the other person/people to do the same.
  • Avoid communicating when you’re in a heightened emotional state, especially when angry or frustrated.

You may be thinking that this all sounds like a lot of work. And effective communication does take effort. But managing the fallout from miscommunication can be a lot more onerous. Let me leave you with two quotes that illustrate why striving for empathy, alignment and clarity in communication; and closing the gap between the intent and the impact of your message, is well worth the effort.

One simple truth from Marty Rubin, author of The Boiled Frog Syndrome:

 “When the meaning is unclear there is no meaning.” 

And this pithy comment on consequences from Ender’s Game by Orson Scott Card:

“So the whole war is because we can't talk to each other.” 

 

Foster better workplace communications with social HCM from NetSuite TribeHR

The Right Equipment: Balancing Electronic and Human Communication

Posted on by Leave a Comment

The debate about technology’s impact on our ability to communicate effectively will likely continue for some time. Many people are convinced that social technology sets us up for misinterpretation and destroys all opportunity for subtlety in our messages.[1] Others believe that our constant reliance on texting, email and social media is destroying the meaningfulness of our relationships and personal interactions.[2] And there is clear evidence that many of the characteristics of today’s technology blunt human empathy.[3] There is no question that the convenience of our technological tools makes keeping in touch easier than ever. But is …

Can I Be Honest With You?

Posted on by Leave a Comment

I was at dinner the other night with my co-worker and we were discussing some recent candidate interviews. One of the candidates had repeatedly said “honestly” before her answers during the interview, and we were discussing how this was a huge pet peeve for both of us in recruiting and sales. “Can I be honest with you?” “Honestly…” “To tell you the truth”--- What else have you been telling me the whole time we have been talking if not the truth? When I hear candidates or sales people use phrases …

5 Things Writing Code Can Teach us About Working With People

Posted on by Leave a Comment

I’m a writer, not a programmer. But I spend much of my life surrounded by people who write code and it’s hard not to cultivate at least a passing familiarity with something that permeates your work environment. You’ll know what I mean if you’ve ever jumped into source view in your content management system, or asked a co-worker to explain that strange combination of English and…whatever…on the monitor.  Feeling a bit like a stranger in a strange land, I decided to learn a little about the local …

Why People Lie

Posted on by Leave a Comment

Looking through a book of trivia the other day, I came across a list of “famous fibs.” Although I added a few from my own experience, I’m sure the list could be much longer. In Business About Speeding About Lost Homework Miscellaneous The check is in the mail. We service what we sell. Money is cheerfully refunded. This is a limited time offer! One size fits all. Your table will be ready in one minute. You must be mistaken. All calls are logged and we have no such record. I had to get to a restroom. …

3 Ways to Re-Shape Your Reality at Work

Posted on by Leave a Comment

Perception is reality. We have only to listen to two distinct descriptions of the same workplace confrontation to know that people in conflict view the same event entirely differently. The most astonishing thing about these opposing versions of the same event is that neither party is lying. Photograph by Alex Hartway, Flickr That’s because each of us believes absolutely in our own perception of things. In other words, each of us believes that our own subjective reality is truth, even in the face of contradictory evidence, and sometimes to our own detriment. There are always as many sides …

Communication is a Hot Topic

Posted on by Leave a Comment

We cover a lot of topics in this TribeHR blog: from workplace accommodation to the impact of catching a few zzzz’s on productivity. Along the way we touch issues of leadership and workplace power dynamics, as well as more traditional HR management concerns like effective onboarding and employee engagement.   While all articles garner a fair amount of interest and certain subjects clearly trend based on the latest HR research or what’s in the news, one topic—communications—is consistently popular. Whether we write about different communication styles, offer Powerpoint “dos and don …

Negotiators: Do You Fit the Profile?

Posted on by Leave a Comment

"Along the grid of negotiating styles, some people take a compromising attitude - a firm but fair give-and-take. Others take the stance: Do it or you're fired. Then there are those who try to ignore problems altogether…Of course, the ideal is a win-win style." [1] In her book, Winning by Negotiation, therapist and business consultant Tessa Albert Warschaw outlines the following basic negotiating styles: U.S. Pacific Air Forces, Flickr Jungle Fighters (win-lose) These people enjoy the challenge of conflict; they are aggressive and apt to resort to cutthroat tactics when negotiations do not go their way. To …

How Do You Handle Conflict?

Posted on by Leave a Comment

K.W Thomas defines conflict as the “process which begins when one party perceives that the other has frustrated, or is about to frustrate, some concern of his”[1] Research demonstrates that people respond to interpersonal conflict with one of five basic reactions (described below). Each reaction can be placed within a range of assertive to non-assertive and cooperative to uncooperative behaviors. [2] Adapted from Conflict and Conflict Management by K. Thomas. Competing Conflict Mode: People with a competing response to conflict typically focus on satisfying their own concerns at the expense of others. Power struggles and win-lose negotiations are …

What HR Can Learn from Effective Sales Proposals

Posted on by Leave a Comment

A sales proposal has three basic objectives. Demonstrate to prospective clients that you fully understand the issues they’re facing and that you “get” what matters to them. Persuade the prospective client that you have the expertise, competence and support to deliver an optimal solution effectively and professionally. Provide supporting evidence and a clear rationale that can serve as justification for the prospect’s decision to commit. Photo by nlst6dh, Flickr Most importantly, an effective sales proposal reflects the challenges and needs of the prospective client and focuses on overcoming those challenges and satisfying those …

Next Page