Why HR Should Toss the Annual Compensation Review

Posted on by Leave a Comment

Wikimedia Commons, Public Domain

Most of us are familiar with the annual performance review process (whether we like it or not!). In addition to annual performance reviews, some companies also implement an annual compensation review process. Sometimes the compensation review is linked to the performance review process, and sometimes it’s not. But regardless of how it’s positioned, the annual compensation review is one potentially destructive practice.

What Drives Annual Compensation Reviews?

When a company chooses to review compensation on an annual basis, the decision is generally driven by a Finance process rather than an HR process. In other words, the review is motivated by budget management concerns rather than retention and succession planning objectives. Understandably, this results in conversations about “how little can we get away with paying this person,” which (especially with top performers) typically leads to a negotiation—and often a confrontational one.

What’s worse, standard compensation review processes seldom (if ever) involve employee feedback or any other information outside the projected salary budget Finance is aiming for. Typically the manager pushes out the proscribed increases to staff based on this limited information, practically ensuring a high error rate, broken trust and employee dissatisfaction. One wonders why any organization would choose to use a process designed to produce bad salary decisions?

Annual Feedback Doesn’t Work

When compensation review is an annual process, it also means that managers can only make corrections or changes at this one time in the year. Knowing this, managers invariably “over steer” since they’ll be locked in for a year once a decision is made. This tendency is further complicated by the manager’s awareness that any change in compensation will be seen as feedback. Employees perceive (rightfully or not) that increased compensation means a job well done, and that static compensation implies sub-par performance. There is growing awareness of how ineffective annual feedback is as compared to ongoing feedback in managing performance and fostering employee engagement. Since changes in compensation are a feedback mechanism, why limit them to once per year?

More Reviews Provide Better Data

Finally, for the Finance department, even from a budgeting and data monitoring perspective, limiting the organization to annual, discrete changes in compensation reduces the richness of data that payroll, finance, CRM, and practically every other system collects. If, instead, a more organic approach was taken to compensation increases, the same macro information would be available (i.e. how much more do we spend each year?) while allowing for deeper analysis of compensation trends based on other parameters (e.g. seasonality, time since hire, correlation to performance, etc.). As an added bonus, cost savings could be realized from the elimination of process overhead.

Aside from creating obstacles for managers, annual compensation reviews also create challenges for employees. If an employee knows he’ll be taking on greater responsibility and additional tasks in six months due to a planned project or anticipated hires on his team, he will face a difficult choice: does he fight now to be paid more than the position is worth, knowing in six months his compensation will be better aligned, or does he accept appropriate pay now and live with being underpaid for the last six months of the year. Employees who understand the implications will typically fight for the earlier raise, which means the organization is both incentivizing employees to ask for premature raises, while at the same time setting employees up for frustration when a deserved raise lags a promotion or greater responsibility.

A Better Approach to Raises

To alleviate this problem, organizations can separate the idea of organizational cost-of-living or pay band adjustments from merit increases. Annual Cost of Living Adjustment (COLA) raises, calculated based on inflation, can be applied automatically on a convenient annual cycle. Similarly, adjustments to pay bands, which are designed to keep up with external market factors and are calculated based on external information, can be applied automatically without requiring review. By removing these elements from performance-based compensation discussions, the organization removes a critical time constraint from the equation and allows managers to offer merit increases when they are most relevant. Feedback is best delivered “in the moment”, and merit increases should follow this rule. Allowing managers to provide increases when deserved (e.g. when taking on more responsibility, or achieving significant growth milestones) gives them the flexibility to provide effective and timely feedback. This, in turn, will result in more trusting and satisfied teams.


Create real efficiencies and support great performance with continuous feedback. Try TribeHR today.

Compensation Equity

Posted on by Leave a Comment

Arriving at fair compensation is not always easy. Aside from the fact that each position has a unique value to an organization and not all jobs are created equal, employers also face the challenge of recognizing and rewarding exemplary performance in a given role. Add to that the fact that people seldom agree on what’s fair and compensation design becomes that much more complicated. Freedom or Fairness by Nina Paley, Wikimedia Commons, Creative Commons Employees consider two things when assessing whether their own compensation is fair. How their compensation compares to their co-workers. How their compensation compares to …

Compensation Design: Beyond Foundational Needs

Posted on by Leave a Comment

US Treasury, Wikimedia Commons, Public Domain We spend a lot of time thinking about (and writing about) employee motivation,engagement and what it takes to create an awesome work environment with a high performance culture. But, before we can turn our sights to creating that awesome environment, there are some basics that must be addressed. As Maslow discovered, people are motivated by different things depending on their current state. This means that people’s foundational (physiological) needs must be met before more complex needs even hit their radar. In the context of the workplace, foundational needs typically relate to …

Managing Multiple Generations in the Workplace

Posted on by Leave a Comment

The face of today’s workforce is changing and the pace of that change is unprecedented. As the typical retirement age moves up and another generation enters the workplace, human capital management will continue to become more complex. Wikimedia Commons, Public Domain The Millennial Influx In Mentoring Millennials, a Harvard Business Review article, the authors state: “The makeup of the global workforce is undergoing a seismic shift: In four years Millennials—the people born between 1977 and 1997—will account for nearly half the employees in the world. In some companies, they already constitute a majority.” In …

Fairness in the Workplace

Posted on by Leave a Comment

Street Art by Alex Proimos,Sydney, Australia, Wikimedia Commons, Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic license People have an inherent need for fairness. In the workplace, perceived injustice has been directly linked to burnout and job dissatisfaction.[1] The challenge for HR arises from the fact that one employee’s fairness often becomes another employee’s perceived injustice. For example, policies designed to address the cumulative effects of systemic injustice over many years may be seen as “special treatment,” triggering feelings of unfairness in other employees today. Various forms of accommodation, whether required by law or preferred by management, …

Help Employees Tackle the Post-Holiday Blues

Posted on by Leave a Comment

Once the chaos and excitement of the holiday season has faded, the decorations have been put away and the social calendar looms empty, it is not uncommon to feel a little lost and blue. Once January rolls around, the focus quickly shifts from managing stress to dealing with this post-holiday crash, the effects of which can range from mild sadness to full-blown depression. Depressed by Sander van der Wel, Netherlands, CC-BY-SA-2.0, Wikimedia Creative Commons What Causes the Post-Holiday Blues? There are a lot of reasons for experiencing post-holiday blues. Those reasons differ from person to person and even from place …

Help Employees Reduce Holiday Stress

Posted on by Leave a Comment

Flickr/Topgold, Creative Commons Yes, we are well into that whirlwind commonly known in North America as “The Holidays.” Beginning in late November, with Thanksgiving, and stretching through to New Year’s Day, it encompasses mayhem, merriment and sometimes a little melancholy. It also ushers in a stretch of stress-inducing chaos, heightened expectations and the inevitable let-down that follows.  As usual, the workplace is not immune to life outside the office.  Throughout December, one of the biggest workplace challenges is dealing with employee stress caused by overloaded schedules, mile-long to-do lists, extreme social commitments and …

Challenge, Change, Choice: NetSuite’s Acquisition of TribeHR

Posted on by Leave a Comment

Recent developments here at TribeHR have us thinking a lot about change.  As a startup, we expect to exist in an environment of rapid and frequent change. We know that certain attributes are needed to survive and thrive in this kind of environment: Wikimedia Commons, Pubic Domain We need to be hyper-aware of the challenges and opportunities swirling around us and be prepared to act quickly in response to both; We need to assess options and make decisions with incomplete information; and We can’t be flustered by change, because nothing is static from one minute to the …

Death of a Sales Rep: How Promotion Fells a Superstar

Posted on by Leave a Comment

In many companies, people are promoted into management because of seniority or as a result of strong performance in their previous role.  Unfortunately, this often results in unqualified, untrained managers.  If you haven’t read The Peter Principle: Why Things Always Go Wrong. by Laurence Peter and Raymond Hull, it provides insight into this principle, commonly stated as “"Employees tend to rise (or be promoted to) to their level of incompetence." Of course, HR professionals know that incompetence can often be addressed through additional education, training, and mentoring in the new role—not so with …

Understanding the Power Dynamic at Work

Posted on by Leave a Comment

Power is an interesting thing. If you believe Margaret Thatcher, “Power is like being a lady…if you have to tell people you are, you aren’t.” People who have power (the ability to exercise authority or influence) may wield it unconsciously (whether poorly or well) or they may deliberately use their power in questionable ways. Plug-in/Flickr/Creative Commons/Gerwin Sturm There are a number of ways to consider power in the workplace and elsewhere. Here is one way of looking at power as presented by the Coady International Institute. Types of Power Power over: …

Next Page

Experience TribeHR for Yourself
Contact us to schedule a demo of TribeHR.

Book A Demo
The Latest from Workplace Tribes
Office Ergonomics and Posture Correction April 21, 2014
Communicating With Purpose April 18, 2014
Why HR Should Toss the Annual Compensation Review April 16, 2014
Working Offsite Boosts Creativity and Focus April 11, 2014
Training: It Takes all Types April 09, 2014
Spring Forward at Work April 07, 2014
Why Employees See Things Differently April 04, 2014
Compensation Equity April 02, 2014
Compensation Design: Beyond Foundational Needs March 31, 2014
5 Ways to Hack Your Job Search March 28, 2014