Problem Solving: A Double Diamond Approach

Posted on by Leave a Comment

Whether you’re designing a new product or solving a personnel problem in the bullpen, there is an optimal process for arriving at a workable solution. Of course, the optimal process is not always the same, and it’s not always followed. This is especially true when it comes to solving people challenges. In fact, when a worker is out of line or conflict erupts, the most common response is a rush to solution: tackling outward behaviors without adequately assessing underlying causes.

Some of the most difficult challenges we face in the workplace are people issues. Speaker and therapist, Connie Podesta, puts it this way, “Life would be easier if it weren’t for other people.”  But, as her keynote presentation soon reveals, people challenges are seldom about what (or who) we think they’re about. Just as pouring water on an electrical fire makes things worse; responding to the symptoms of a people problem often causes things to escalate or worse, go underground.

When Albert Einstein was asked about his approach to solving difficult problems, he responded: “If I had an hour to solve a problem I'd spend 55 minutes thinking about the problem and 5 minutes thinking about solutions.”  He also said; “No problem can be solved from the same level of consciousness that created it.”

When you put these two ideas together, it’s clear that a different approach to problem solving and some new ways of thinking are needed.

During a workshop on design thinking the other day, I learned about a process that has potential outside the realm of design. It’s called the Double Diamond approach and it looks like this.

Diagram of the Double Diamond approach to designSource: The Design Council

First Explore, Then Assess

The shape of the image has meaning. From the starting point of a recognized problem, a root cause analysis begins. From that point of origin, the emergence of the first diamond represents the exploration of possible causes and requires the conscious use of divergent thinking.

Divergent Thinking

The goal of divergent thinking is to be creative and generate as many ideas as possible without imposing boundaries or judgment. As the discovery process continues the diamond expands.

Once the possibilities have been fully explored, it’s time to sort through them and determine the underlying cause that seems most valid to everyone involved in the process.

Convergent Thinking

The second half of the diamond requires convergent thinking and the application of judgment, assessment and critical thinking skills, all in pursuit of fully understanding the problem before considering solutions.

The first diamond is not complete until:

  • everyone involved has been heard,
  • underlying causes have been fully explored, and
  • there is agreement on the problem definition.

The Second Diamond

The next step involves switching back to divergent thinking in pursuit of all possible solutions and the second diamond emerges. The intent at this stage, once again, is discovery; the process is free-flowing, without boundaries until the possibilities are exhausted. Only then can the task of weighing the options and sorting through potential solutions begin. Switching back to convergent thinking for the final stage, solutions are evaluated and an optimal approach to solving the problem is chosen.

Seek First to Understand

The Double Diamond process is not time-bound because solving complex challenges can’t be rushed. This is especially true during the problem definition stage: the first diamond. Einstein knew that truly understanding a problem is the most important part of the process. Although widely seen as a genius, Einstein himself said ““I have no special talents. I am only passionately curious.”

When it comes to resolving people challenges in the workplace; putting a Band-Aid on symptoms rarely succeeds. Being “passionately curious,” striving to understand what lies beneath the surface, and helping people reconcile the varying perspectives contributing to the problem—this is how you create workable solutions to complex problems. Perhaps polishing your Double Diamond approach is a good place to start.


Give your people the tools they need to be creative problems solvers with powerful talent management software from TribeHR. Try it out free for 30 days.



The Design Council:


University of Washington

Idea Generation: Divergent vs. Convergent Thinking

Our Hidden Biases and What to Do About Them

Posted on by Leave a Comment

A friend of mine once said, “for every PhD thesis, there is an equal and opposite PhD thesis. Certainly, I’ve come to learn there are (at least) two sides to every story and that what we see in a given situation is often exactly what we’re looking for. Cognitive bias research makes it abundantly clear that we are seldom the objective observers and rational decision makers we prefer to believe we are. Cognitive biases are “mental errors caused by our simplified information processing strategies…a cognitive bias does not result from any emotional …

When Job Ownership Runs Amok

Posted on by Leave a Comment

When it comes to fostering engagement in the workplace, encouraging employees to take ownership of their jobs is right up there with providing meaningful work. In American Venture Magazine[1], Dr. Noelle C. Nelson writes: “Studies show that job satisfaction among employees by itself doesn't predict productivity. It is only when job satisfaction is paired with psychological well-being at work that productivity is high. Psychological well-being at work includes a sense of purpose in one's job and a feeling of accomplishment. One of the easiest ways of supporting employees' sense of purpose is to give them ownership of …

A Diverse Team Counters Complacency

Posted on by Leave a Comment

A colleague handed me a book the other day. The cover looked like a children’s book and the title did little to dispel that impression: A Peacock in the Land of Penguins.  Like many business books in recent years, the authors (B.J Gallagher and Warren H. Schmidt) decided to create a fable[1]  to illustrate their point and share an important business lesson. It was a very fast read: large print, short pages, and plenty of illustrations. In fact, the book was deceptively simple. It was an entertaining light read with a heavy, even vital, message …

4 Steps to Make Your HR Tactics Strategic

Posted on by Leave a Comment

In his article Strategic vs. Tactical Thinking: Empowering the HR Professional, Hebe Lugo differentiates between the two as follows: “doing things right” is tactical thinking, while “doing the right things” is strategic thinking. The challenge for HR professionals is that success relies on “doing the right things right!” Milan Mikuláštík - Chessball/Wikimedia Commons In other words, focusing purely on strategy without ensuring effective implementation is just as potentially damaging as ignoring strategy in favor of exemplary tactics.   Even more challenging is ensuring the use of effective strategy …

Human Rights and Human Wrongs

Posted on by Leave a Comment

From an HR perspective, any discussion of human rights typically revolves around discrimination and the prevention of discriminatory practices in hiring, managing or disciplining workers. Specifics about what constitutes discrimination, and who is protected against it, vary from one jurisdiction to another. In some ways, the U.S. sets a high standard for protecting human rights in the workplace, and yet it’s evident that: Photo by Jenny Downing, Flickr “The concept of workers’ rights as human rights has only recently begun to influence the formation and implementation of labor policy in the United States. In the …

Connecting the Dots Between HCM and Financial Performance

Posted on by Leave a Comment

Intuitively we know that exceptional talent and high employee engagement make a company more successful. We know that high performing teams are more productive and high trust work environments support all of the above. The challenge for human resources executives and managers, however, is to translate that intuitive understanding into concrete metrics that justify their commitment to the necessary HR policies and people investments. HR Policy and Investment Outcomes The Investor Responsibility Research Center Institute (IRRCi) together with Larry Beeferman and Aaron Bernstein (Labor and Worklife Program, Harvard Law School) may have just made this connection a little easier to …

What’s the Deal with Unretirement?

Posted on by Leave a Comment

The vanguard of the boomer bulge is reaching retirement age. At least, they’re reaching the age at which people have traditionally retired since the early 1900s: i.e 65. Of course, when 65 was originally set as the standard (and often mandatory) retirement age, most people died within a few years of retirement. These post-retirement sunset years were a well-deserved rest after a lifetime of work and represented a short final chapter for most people. Photo by Emilio Labrador, Senior Guard, Flickr Things have changed.  The trend toward earlier and earlier retirement that characterized the last century has …

Was That Insubordination or Just Attitude?

Posted on by Leave a Comment

Insubordination is variously defined as the “willful failure to obey a supervisor's lawful orders; refusal to obey some order which a superior officer is entitled to give and is entitled to have obeyed; intentional refusal to obey an employer's lawful and reasonable order; or more simply—disobedience to authority.” Mutiny on the Bounty by Pascal, Flickr But simply having a bad attitude at work doesn’t necessarily qualify as insubordination. Insolence, for example, is often inaccurately labeled insubordination. According to Sacha Morrisset of Stewart McKelvey: “Insolence refers to derisive, abusive or contemptuous language, …

The Talent Mindset of Leaders

Posted on by Leave a Comment

Unlocking the talent mindset of your leadership style, whether you are a front-line supervisor or the CEO, is the first essential key to sustaining strong talent practices. The talent mindset can be defined as having the understanding and ability to recruit, retain, and recognize talent in individuals that can be effectively deployed and continuously developed towards a specific purpose that aligns the individual’s strengths and motivations to the short and long-term goals of the organization.  McKinsey & Company in their book “The War for Talent” examined high performing organizations in comparison to cohorts. The single …

Next Page

Experience TribeHR for Yourself
Contact us to schedule a demo of TribeHR.

Book A Demo
The Latest from Workplace Tribes
Achieving Successful Change October 08, 2015
Navigating HCM October 06, 2015
Employment and Disability October 01, 2015
Problem Solving: A Double Diamond Approach September 29, 2015
Our Hidden Biases and What to Do About Them September 24, 2015
Know Your Why September 22, 2015
When Job Ownership Runs Amok September 17, 2015
5 Things Writing Code Can Teach us About Working With People September 15, 2015
How to Avoid Meeting Burnout September 10, 2015
What Does Labor Day Mean to You? September 07, 2015