Connecting the Dots Between HCM and Financial Performance

Posted on by Leave a Comment

Intuitively we know that exceptional talent and high employee engagement make a company more successful. We know that high performing teams are more productive and high trust work environments support all of the above.

The challenge for human resources executives and managers, however, is to translate that intuitive understanding into concrete metrics that justify their commitment to the necessary HR policies and people investments.

HR Policy and Investment Outcomes

The Investor Responsibility Research Center Institute (IRRCi) together with Larry Beeferman and Aaron Bernstein (Labor and Worklife Program, Harvard Law School) may have just made this connection a little easier to illustrate. They recently completed an analysis of existing research into the relationship between corporate HR policies and financial performance, to determine whether they are connected. The results of their research offer strong evidence of positive correlations between HR policies and key financial metrics, including return on equity, return on investment and profit margins.

In designing their investigation, one of the challenges the researchers faced was finding empirical studies that focused on the financial impacts of HR policies, since human capital has historically been seen as a social component of the corporate structure rather than a bottom line contributor.  In the end, they found 92 studies “that used conventional investment indicators to emphasize the conclusion that human capital is material under definitions acceptable to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and U.S. securities law.”

The majority of those studies demonstrated positive correlations between training and HR policies with respect to better investment outcomes. The following table[1] from the report illustrates the frequency of these positive correlations.

Human Capital Studies



Financial Effect










Training (36 Studies)









HR Policy (56 Studies)









Total Number of Studies










The report’s authors seek to highlight the implications for investors of clear corporate training and well aligned HR policies—such as those included in high performance work systems (HPWS)—by demonstrating their positive impact on investment returns. In the words of Aaron Bernstein, study co-author, “Decades of research offer powerful evidence that human capital factors can be material to financial performance…”   

No Single HR Policy Wins 

Interestingly, aside from training, which showed a positive impact on its own, there were no individual HR policies that outperformed. Rather, the simple presence of bundled HR policies that aligned with corporate culture (whatever that culture might be) was the factor that positively correlated with improved financial performance. The following is a list of the most commonly occurring policies appearing in the research, many of which are associated with high performance work systems.)[2]

Compensation and Benefits

  • Pay for Performance
  • Formal Appraisal for Pay
  • External Pay Equity/Competitiveness
  • Incentive Compensation
  • Comprehensive Benefits
  • Profit or Gain Sharing
  • Group-Based Pay Pay for Skills/Knowledge
  • Employee Stock Ownership
  • Bonuses or Cash for Performance
  • Equitable Pay Processes
  • Public Recognition/Nonfinancial Rewards

Job and Work Design

  • Decentralized Participative Decisions
  • Project or Other Temporary Work Teams
  • Job Analysis
  • Job Rotation/Cross Functional
  • Utilization Self-Managed Work Teams (Quality Circles)
  • Greater Discretion and Autonomy
  • Job Enlargement and Enrichment
  • Broad Task Responsibilities
  • Flexible Work Schedule

Training and Development

  • Training Extensiveness
  • Use of Training to Improve Performance
  • Training for Job or Firm Specific Skill
  • Training for Career Development
  • Evaluation of Training
  • Cross-Functional or Multiskill Training
  • New Employee Training and Orientation

Recruiting and Selection

  • Hiring Selectivity or Low Selection Ratio
  • Specific and Explicit Hiring Criteria
  • Multiple Tools Used to Screen Applicants
  • Employment Tests or Structured Interviews
  • Planning Selection Processes and Staffing
  • Matching Candidates to Firm Strategy
  • Innovative Recruiting Practices

Employee Relations

  • Job Security/Emphasis on Permanent Jobs
  • Low Status Differentials
  • Complaint or Grievance Procedure
  • Measurement of Employee Relations Outcomes
  • Employee Opinion and Attitude Surveys
  • Labor Union Collaboration
  • Social and Family Events and Policies
  • Diversity and Equal Employment Opportunity


  • Formal Information Sharing Program
  • Employees Receive Market, Firm Performance, or Strategic Information
  • Employee Input and Suggestion Processes
  • Frequent/Regular Meetings with Employees

Performance Management and Appraisal

  • Appraisals Based on Objective Results/Behaviors
  • Appraisals for Development/Potential
  • Frequent Performance Appraisal Meetings
  • Employees Involved in Setting Appraisal Objectives
  • Written Performance Plan With Defined Objectives
  • Multisource Feedback and Peer Appraisal
  • Appraisal Based on Strategic or Team Goals


  • Promotions From Within
  • Promotions Objectively Based on Merit
  • Career Planning
  • Promotion Opportunities (e.g., frequency)
  • Career Paths and Job Ladders
  • Succession Planning
  • Turnover, Retention, and Exit Management

Once again, it’s easy to make the intuitive leap from many of these policies to a more engaged, committed and productive workforce—and from there to improved financial performance. But intuition has always been a double-edged sword for HR professionals.

An inherent (or intuitive) understanding of human nature is a distinct asset when it comes to fostering high-trust working environments, but translating that awareness into an effective business case can be daunting. That’s why this report is so encouraging. From our perspective (the HR perspective) it helps to have some concrete evidence to support our belief that good human capital management (HCM) is just good business!


Subscribe to the TribeHR blog for regular HR insight and resources to support a changing workplace.

[1] The IRRC, Aaron Bernstein and Larry Beeferman (April 2015) The Materiality of Human Capital to Corporate Financial Performance. Table 1.

[2] The list (table) provided in the report was taken from: Posthuma. 2013. The study authors found that these 61 policies appeared a total of 2,042 times in 181 peer-reviewed academic and practitioner studies of high performance work systems published between 1992 and 2011. These included studies that examined correlations to investment outcomes as well as those that looked at other variables.

What’s the Deal with Unretirement?

Posted on by Leave a Comment

The vanguard of the boomer bulge is reaching retirement age. At least, they’re reaching the age at which people have traditionally retired since the early 1900s: i.e 65. Of course, when 65 was originally set as the standard (and often mandatory) retirement age, most people died within a few years of retirement. These post-retirement sunset years were a well-deserved rest after a lifetime of work and represented a short final chapter for most people. Photo by Emilio Labrador, Senior Guard, Flickr Things have changed.  The trend toward earlier and earlier retirement that characterized the last century has …

Was That Insubordination or Just Attitude?

Posted on by Leave a Comment

Insubordination is variously defined as the “willful failure to obey a supervisor's lawful orders; refusal to obey some order which a superior officer is entitled to give and is entitled to have obeyed; intentional refusal to obey an employer's lawful and reasonable order; or more simply—disobedience to authority.” Mutiny on the Bounty by Pascal, Flickr But simply having a bad attitude at work doesn’t necessarily qualify as insubordination. Insolence, for example, is often inaccurately labeled insubordination. According to Sacha Morrisset of Stewart McKelvey: “Insolence refers to derisive, abusive or contemptuous language, …

The Talent Mindset of Leaders

Posted on by Leave a Comment

Unlocking the talent mindset of your leadership style, whether you are a front-line supervisor or the CEO, is the first essential key to sustaining strong talent practices. The talent mindset can be defined as having the understanding and ability to recruit, retain, and recognize talent in individuals that can be effectively deployed and continuously developed towards a specific purpose that aligns the individual’s strengths and motivations to the short and long-term goals of the organization.  McKinsey & Company in their book “The War for Talent” examined high performing organizations in comparison to cohorts. The single …

Six Tips to Help Employees Survive the Holidays

Posted on by Leave a Comment

The holiday season is meant to be a time of celebration. A time for families and friends to gather and observe their own unique traditions. In spite of this (and sometimes because of it!), for many, the holiday season is also a time of great stress. Increased personal and family demands associated with the season can leave your employees run ragged. Velas Candles by Guillermo Viciano, Flickr Aside from providing the ubiquitous holiday party, employers can help employees get through the holiday season unscathed and unruffled with a variety of simple, thoughtful acts. Here are a few examples to get …

Centralized Versus Decentralized HR

Posted on by Leave a Comment

For companies with multiple, geographically distributed locations, deciding whether or not to centralize HR is a decision with broad operational and strategic implications. A centralized approach enables an organization to streamline departmental functions across a complex system. It also ensures that HR policies are applied consistently and that information is managed in a unified way. Wikimedia Commons, Public Domain On the other hand, different locations are typically subject to distinct human resources regulatory and payroll tax environments, not to mention unique recruiting cultures; which lends weight to the argument for decentralization.   Multi-location companies that have grown through acquisition typically …

Paycards Versus Paychecks

Posted on by Leave a Comment

There’s been a lot of controversy lately over the use of payroll cards instead of paychecks for delivering employee compensation. The practice of using paycards was implemented by employers as a convenient way to pay employees who don’t maintain a traditional bank account. With many employers now processing payroll by direct deposit via electronic funds transfer (EFT), paycards offer a convenient alternative for paying employees who can’t receive their pay via EFT. More recently, some organizations have expanded their use of payroll cards. For example, MacDonald's has allowed individual franchise owners to decide …

Achieving Fair Pay Regardless of Gender

Posted on by Leave a Comment

Recently we shared some of our own efforts to increase the diversity of our workforce, especially with respect to gender balance. Like most software development firms, we typically receive many more resumes and inquiries from male candidates, especially for software engineers and other technical roles. Recently, we’ve had some great success sourcing qualified female candidates through a local job fair, although we’re still not sure what caused the unusual skew in that instance. In addition to being a software development company, we’re also an HR company, by virtue of the fact that we develop …

Two Approaches to Calculating Bonuses

Posted on by Leave a Comment

There are a lot of traditions surrounding the distribution of bonuses ranging from timing to eligibility, from merit to patronage, from celebration to stomach ulcers. The less pleasant traditions are usually a result of poorly defined structure or “bias bonuses” that reward people based on favoritism and politics rather than contribution. Photo by Frédéric Bisson, Flickr To ensure that bonus time creates a positive tradition in your organization, here are two vastly different approaches that strive to address common bonus time inequities. The Standard Approach The annual bonus is a common approach used by …

Creating a Path for Growth

Posted on by Leave a Comment

 Photo Credit: Nicholas A. Tonelli, Flikr Research shows that one of the most important attractors in a job search (and one of the strongest incentives for existing employees to stay with an organization), is the availability of growth opportunities. At the same time, company structures are becoming flatter, with fewer levels of management and less hierarchy. These increasingly horizontal organizational structures have resulted in more lateral movement and “cross training” to support career development aspirations. Some people find scaling the “career lattice” more satisfying than the traditional approach to climbing the corporate ladder. But there …

Next Page

Experience TribeHR for Yourself
Contact us to schedule a demo of TribeHR.

Book A Demo
The Latest from Workplace Tribes
Group Dynamics The Roles People Play (Part 1 of 3) May 21, 2015
7 Tips for Reducing Pre-Vacation Stress May 19, 2015
3 Ways to Re-Shape Your Reality at Work May 14, 2015
Timely Feedback: Every Day is Mothers’ Day May 12, 2015
Mental Health: Are You Aware? May 07, 2015
When an Employee is in Denial May 05, 2015
What Leaders Do April 30, 2015
Connecting the Dots Between HCM and Financial Performance April 28, 2015
SuiteWorld Is All About Empowering People and People Power April 23, 2015
Making and Breaking Habits April 21, 2015